Master Research Report
Findings of the current research
are summarized in the , which consists of eight sections. The Introduction (Chapter
1) summarizes background and rational for the research. Chapter 2
discusses environmental safety from the public policy perspective as an
issue of national security. Chapter 3 refers to analyzes the current
role of insurance for ensuring environmental safety. Chapter 4 provides
the analytical framework for 'national' research outlining policy
process and defining criteria for further studies. Chapter 5 presents
findings of current situation with EI implementation in the Russian
Federation. Section 5.1 sets the scene for the discussion of the
current and perspective role of insurance in managing environmental
risks in Russia. After review of research methodology (Section 5.2) and
a brief overview of key steps of EI promotion at the national level
(Section 5.3) Section 5.4 particularly deals with analysis of the EI
system determinants. The findings of this analysis are summarized in
Section 5.5. Chapter 6 is devoted to case studies of EI promotion at
the regional level in Russia with concluding Section 6.5 presenting key
factors of success for EI implementation at the regional level in
Russia. Key research findings as well as possible approaches to EI
promotion it at the regional level in Russia (policy options) based on
these findings are presented in Chapter 7.
Abstract
Environmental insurance (EI) has been considered as an effective tool
to strengthen environmental safety worldwide. It allows for pooling
resources for pro-active risk reduction measures and paying
compensations for affected parties in case of damage occurred.
Moreover, it provides incentives for cleaner and safer production.
Environmental insurance was introduced into Russian environmental
policy agenda as early as in 1991. The study of the current national EI
system proved the system under development. There are factors
associated with the EI socio-economic, political, and institutional
context both encouraging EI development (e.g. aggravation of
environmental problems and steady upturn of the national insurance
market) and those acting as obstacles, including the low level of
environmental consciousness of the society and weak capacity of the
national environmental management system. A number of deficiencies in
the EI legislation were identified. There is a need for strengthening
EI formal guidance in terms of approval the relevant guidelines and
procedures. Institutional capacity of many EI stakeholders, including
local authorities, judicial bodies, and the general public, is not
sufficient for adequate performing their functions. As a result, the
actual practice of applying insurance for protecting against
technology-related environmental risks has been limited so far.
Despite these limitations there have been attempts to implement
insurance into regional environmental policies in several Russian
regions, including the Moscow Region, the Leningrad Region, the Nizhniy
Novgorod Region, and the Bashkortostan Republic. Factors of success for
EI promotion include, among others, i) the support from top regional
officials, ii) integration of EI promotion into regional strategic
initiatives, iii) developed insurance community, iv) influential
environmental authorities, and v) collaboration with counterparts form
other regions.
Based on the review of EI from international, national, and regional
perspective, possible approaches to introducing insurance into
environmental security policies at the regional level in Russia are
developed. They differ in the direct regulatory input to EI promotion.
Relevance of these alternative to current context dependent on the
state of national EI system determinants were discussed the most
appropriate was singled out.
The current research contributes to knowledge on the current place of
EI in the Russian public policies for environmental insurance and
provides background for devising recommendations on fostering EI
development in the pilot region (the Vologda Region) (see ).
Keywords: environmental risk management,
environmental policy, environmental safety, environmental insurance
|