Research Proposal
Title:
Better Practices for Scaling-up Rural Microfinance in Tajikistan
General
The question of how to
best develop an effective rural financial system has been much debated
over the past three decades. A significant evolution in agricultural and
rural development strategies has taken place over the last decade. This
evolution represents a shift away from supply-led and interventionist
policies towards a more liberal, market-oriented approach.
Liberalization of the financial sector includes the elimination of
regulated interest rates and directed credit programs, and the
restructuring or liquidation of state-owned agricultural development
banks.
Lack of access to formal credit and to full financial
intermediation services impedes agricultural development and hampers the
efforts to alleviate rural poverty. However, new initiatives are being
undertaken to meet the demand for rural credit. They include the reform
of agricultural development banks, enabling them to pursue a market
approach in the delivery of credit services to small and medium-sized
rural clients.
Two recent developments have influenced these initiatives.
The first one has been the adoption of a “financial systems” development
approach. This emphasizes the need for an integrated approach to
financial market development and the provision of competitive and
durable financial services in local financial markets. A clear
understanding of both client demand and existing informal financial
services providers is required. In fact, over the last decades,
development agencies, NGOs, practitioners and researchers have
accumulated substantial experience in operating financial services for
rural clients.
The second development has been the emergence of specialized
microfinance institutions. Microenterprise credit programs were
initiated to address the unemployment problems that are associated with
the vast rural-urban migration in developing countries. Initially, they
targeted the promotion of self-employment and income-generating
activities for the urban poor. The evolution in microfinance, like the
earlier one in rural finance, has been affected by the principles of
financial systems development. Attention is on developing financial
institutions that target low-income clients while pursuing commercial
viability.
Although today only a few microfinance institutions have
achieved full financial independence, many more use innovative credit
technologies and have developed organizational structures that produce
positive results. These initiatives illustrate the potential to overcome
the financial barriers that commercial banks traditionally face when
they try to lend to low-income clients.
The goal of this research will be to identify those lending
practices that are able to address the challenge of financing small
farmer clients. Within the framework of rural financial markets, the
text concentrates on the specific issues of lending to agricultural
producers. The lessons that can be learned from microfinance will be
reviewed and an assessment will be made of the possibility of
transferring successful microcredit practices to agricultural lending.
In addition, the experiences and the strategies of three micro and rural
finance institutions doing agricultural lending will be examined in
greater detail.
The research work will be divided into four chapters.
I. The Rural
Microfinance: Markets, Costs and Risks
Chapter 1 will give a brief overview of agricultural finance
and highlights its unique features. The detailed analysis of the
characteristics of agricultural lending also will be presented in this
chapter. In research work these features will be examined, with regard
to the implications they have on the management of the costs and risks
faced by agricultural lending institutions.
Agricultural lenders face distinct challenges that are
related to the specific nature of farm production. Particular attention
in this chapter will be given to the factors that affect the design of
agricultural lending products.
Firstly a summary will be given of the past agricultural
credit policies including the shift from supply-led and directed
agricultural credit programs towards rural financial market development.
In the current prevailing market environment in developing countries,
major attention is now given to the assessment of the effective demand
for financial services. The unique features of agricultural lending
also will be outlined in this chapter. Major attention will be given to
an assessment of the specific cost and risk barriers that formal lenders
face in agricultural lending.
II. Lessons from Rural
Microfinance: Cost Reduction and Risk Management Strategies
Chapter 2 will summarize the main lessons that have been
learned from microcredit. It presents the approaches that successful
microlenders follow in managing their costs and risks in lending. The
chapter concludes by indicating the main limitations that the
microcredit lessons have for agricultural lending.
During recent years, financial services have been provided to
an increasing number of low-income people and microentrepreneurs because
of innovative developments in “microfinance”. Microfinance refers to
that part of the financial sector that responds to the financial demand
of low-income households. Until now, microfinance institutions have
operated mainly in urban areas. They provide small and short-term loans
predominantly for trading, services and microenterprise activities. The
lessons learned from the failures of the earlier directed agricultural
credit projects plus the principles of the new financial systems
development approach have been particularly influential in microfinance.
Important progress has been made in the areas of institutional and
organizational set-up and operational strategies. New lending
technologies have been designed for low-income clients.
In this chapter, the key lessons that have emerged as the
“best practices” in the field of microfinance will be examined. The
chapter will review the supply and demand features of microcredit and
will examine some key factors, which have emerged from the cumulative
experiences of microcredit. Particular attention will be given to the
review of the microcredit technologies and the contribution that they
make towards managing the costs and risks of small loans. The main
limitations that are encountered in transferring the microcredit
practices to agricultural lending also will be highlighted in this
chapter.
III. Rural Microfinance
and Agricultural Lending: Lessons from the Field
Three field experiences in agricultural lending will be
reviewed in Chapter 3. The objective of this chapter is to assess the
innovations that have enabled the case study lending institutions to
meet the challenges that are traditionally associated with the granting
of rural and agricultural credit. Particular attention will be given to
those aspects that facilitate a better cost and risk management in
agricultural lending.
There are the examples of a number of successful agricultural
development banks. Although there are few microfinance institutions
currently engaged in agricultural lending, some of them have broken new
ground. Their experiences are worthy of study and important lessons can
be learned.
The three case studies that have been selected for this study
are: Grameen Bank in
Bangladesh, FINCA
Kyrgyzstan in Kyrgyzstan and Development Fund in Tajikistan.
These institutions have widely different ownership structure,
institutional and organizational set-up, duration of operations, size,
credit technologies and type of clientele. They have also quite
different backgrounds and mandates.
Grameen Bank started in
Bangladesh to assist
the rural poor. Small amounts are loaned, mostly to women, without
collateral and without guarantors. So far loans have been made to more
than 600,000 people. Even though money is lent without collateral, the
Grameen Bank reports a 98% repayment rate, far in excess of most
conventional banks.
FINCA
Kyrgyzstan started in
1995 with funds granted by USAID. Now FINCA Kyrgyzstan is the leading
MFI in Kyrgyzstan, serving over 30,000 clients. FINCA
Kyrgyzstan is
also one of the premier MFIs in the NIS, with its profitability and
asset quality exceeding industry standard.
Development Fund in
Tajikistan is the local
NGO doing agricultural and rural lending from 1999. Loans are made for
production and processing of agricultural products to the groups without
collateral and to the individuals with collateral. Fund’s goal is to
provide farm households with access to agricultural credit and other
financial services on a nationwide basis.
These organizations employ a different agricultural lending
technology and have distinct institutional structures and operate in
different environments. They represent successful urban microlenders
which are expanding their operations into rural areas. They illustrate
the adaptation of urban microcredit technology to the specific demand
features of a rural clientele. They have developed credit technologies
that deal with the high costs and risks that are associated with lending
to small farm households.
This chapter focuses on those factors that are especially
relevant to the management of costs and risks in agricultural lending.
The first section of the chapter provides a brief overview of the
institutional profile, the clientele served and the performance of each
of the three case studies. The second section examines the strategies
that are used to reduce the costs and to manage the risks in
agricultural lending.
IV. Summary and
Conclusions
Chapter 4 will summarize conclusions and highlight the
remaining challenges in agricultural lending. This research will examine
the challenges that agricultural lenders face in designing and operating
demand-oriented lending services. These systems should be widely
accessible to small farm households and durable. Based on the
preliminary guiding principles that will be developed for agricultural
lending, a summary presents the main lending strategies. These methods
can be used to reduce the high costs and risks of lending to small
farmers. Selected annotations also will be provided for a number of key
aspects.