Research paper of IPF fellow Nana Sumbadze on the project: “Preparation
of the program for opening the Center for Social Partnership” (Draft)
(Part of the research is carried out together with IPF fellow George Tarkhan-Mouravi)
1.Problem background
Georgia is the country where next to each other live people of different ethnicity and confession. The future of the country and the well-being of its population greatly depends on the co-existence of
population, on their sharing the main values and responsibilities. Azeries and Armenians , comprise the biggest minorities of the country. Moslem Meskhetians constitute another big group, although not yet residing in Georgia, cultural integration of whom is of a paramount importance for the state. Religion, language and culture of Azeri and Moslem Meskhetians are quite close to each other and hence the problems of integration of these two groups can be discussed together.
The main goal of the project is the preparation of a program and a working plan for the opening of the “Center for Social Partnership”. The need for establishing of such a center became especially evident as a result of the research carried out in the framework of the Open Society Institute International Policy Fellowship. The study of Moslem Meskhetians – Turcophone group deported in 1944 from South Georgia to Central Asia and now spread all over Central Asia, North Caucasus, central Russia and Ukraine, but in the first place concentrated in Azerbaijan, revealed that one of the main obstacles for repatriation, which is much sought by Meskhetians and is strongly advocated by the Council of Europe and other International organizations, is a negative attitude of the majority of Georgia’s population towards their return. Such an attitude is to a considerable degree determined by the low level of integration of Moslem Meskhetians to local communities in Georgia, as previously before the deportation, as well currently in the countries of their present residence.
Repatriation of Moslem Meskhetians is the obligation signed as a precondition of membership of Georgia in the Council of Europe, and is at the same time undoubtedly the question of the restoration of historical justice and a moral imperative for the Georgian state. However, without adequate planning and close monitoring of the process, it can turn into still another tragedy both for Moslem Meskhetians themselves as well as for the Georgian state. Expected influx of Moslem Meskhetians in coming twelve years should be well prepared on legislative and organizational levels. Contact of local population with returnees can easily become a source of conflict, especially if the other side is perceived as a rival for available scarce resources. Therefore there is a pressing need of organizing the contacts between the local population and returnees in a way conducive for peaceful cooperation.
In the survey, representatives of the population of Georgia, as well as Moslem Meskhetians living in Georgia and Azerbaijan, pointed to the big cultural distance separating deported people from the local population in Georgia. This distance is first of all determined by poor command of Georgian, different religious practices, little knowledge of dominant traditions, customs and history of Georgia. Not much is known by the local population either about the culture and the history of Moslem Meskhetians. Attitudes of both groups feed on myths and memories of enmity rather than on facts of past peaceful co-existence.
The second group, whose integration issues should be targeted by the Center for Social Partnership is the community of ethnic Armenians, residing in South Georgia, compactly in Javakheti (districts of Akhalkalaki and Ninotsminda), in villages of Akhaltsikhe district, and are mixed with Georgian population in capital Tbilisi and town of Akhaltsikhe.
The research carried out on Moslem Meskhetians and reflected in policy paper of 2001 IPF Fellowship allowed to single out the main issues that should be addresses by the center. Below is the attempt to analyze the problems of integration which are faced by the Armenian population residing in the South of Georgia, in the region of Samtskhe-Javakheti.
2.1.General
discription
Samtskhe-Javakheti region is one of the 11 regions of Georgia. Akhaltsikhe, the regional centre is on 262
kms distance from the capital, Tbilisi. Region borders Turkey and
Armenia. Samtskhe-Javakheti
province occupies about 9.3% of Georgia's entire territory and accounts for about
4.4% of its population, is among the most ethnically non-homogeneous regions of
Georgia. A number of its current problems stem from this diversity. Integrating
the two major ethnic groups – Armenians and Georgians, represents a major
political challenge for the region. The ethnic composition is characterized by
clear-cut ethnic boundaries between different settlement types, and the absence
of major mixed ethnic settlements. The only truly mixed in Samtskhe-Javakheti province is town of
Akhaltsikhe.
Samtskhe-Javakheti
region consists of an area of c. 6,400 square kilometres and has a total
population of almost 235,000. Samtskhe-Javakheti is a historical region of
Georgia, which is characterised by a number of specific difficulties
exacerbating the general political and socio-economic problems of Georgia.
2.2.Natural conditions and terrain
Samtskhe-Javakheti
is located in the Southern part of Georgia, in the Mtkvari river basin, and
consists of 6 districts with regional capital in Akhaltsikhe. Geologically it
is composed by predominantly volcanic structures, and prone two earthquakes.
Map of Samtskhe-Javakheti (from Antonenko 2001)
Akhaltsikhe district, with area just slightly more than
1010 sq. km is comprised of two towns - Akhaltsikhe and Vale, and 47 villages
united into 16 communities with local governments. It is located north to the
Turkish border, between the southern slopes of Meskheti and northern slopes of
Erusheti ranges. The town of Akhaltsikhe lies along the banks of the Potskhovi
river where it joins the valley of Mtkvari. Main rivers are Mtkvari, which,
after originating in Turkey, crosses the region for 40 km, also rivers of
Potskhovi and its tributaries Qvabliani and Uraveli, and the smaller rivulets
of Tsinubnistskali and Chvintagele. Near the village Tskaltbila there is also a
thermal sulphuric spring, with two more mineral water springs in Uraveli and
Tsinubani.
Climate in Akhaltsikhe dustrict is dry continental, with little precipitation.
The region is located on the altitude from 950m (village Atskuri) to 2964m (Mta
Gumbati). Average annual temperature is between 6 and 9 Co. The
winter frosts start in October and last until April. January is the coldest
month of the year with average temperature of –3.8C. The hottest month is August,
when temperature often reaches 40 Co. The average annual humidity is
between 65% and 75%. Annual precipitation varies between 500 and 700 mm, with
maximum precipitation occurring in June (40-70 mm) and minimum in January (30-35mm).
Snow cover stays between December and March.
The terrain of
the district is complex, with volcanic mountains and hills, terraces, narrow
valleys, small caves in the cliffy river banks, mostly with scarce vegetation -
xerophytic bushes growing on the rocky slopes, sub-alpine and alpine meadows up
in the hills. Rare forests are comprised by oak and carpinus caucasica,
pines and firs. There are three main zones of soil varieties in the district -
transitory forest, mountain forest, and meadow type. Actually, about 30% of the
territory is covered with bushes and forests, and 40%, i.e. about 40 thousand
ha, are agricultural lands, from which 30% are pastures and meadows and 10% are
arable lands. The district is rich with mineral resources, including soft
bituminous coal (Vale and Naokhrebi mines), diatomite (in Kisatibi), agate
(Shurdo and Pamaj-Ziareti mines), gypsum (in Tskaltbila) and many varieties of
mineral building materials.
The district is connected with Tbilisi by a highway (224km) and a railway
via Borjomi. Another highway connects Akhaltsikhe also with Turkey, near the
Vale cross point. Other roads are leading also to Batumi (via Goderdzi pass),
Kutaisi (via Zekari pass), and Armenia (via Akhalkalaki). The length of
districts’ inner (mostly gravel) roads is 290km.
Administrative
district of Akhalkalaki is the biggest in Samtskhe-Javakheti, it covers
1,235 square km. Apart from the township of Akhalkalaki (known since 9th-10th
cc. as located on the crossroad of the Great Silk way) - the sole urban
settlement in the district located at the altitude of 1700 m, there are 21
rural communities, uniting 64 villages.
The district is situated on Javakheti volcanic highland plane at the
altitude of c. 1500-2000 m, with highest elevation reaching 3304 m. The area is
rich in basalt. Geotectonic composition is geologically young and rather
unstable, and the area is considered as highly prone to earthquakes. In the
East the district is bordered by Abul-Samsar range, while in the North it is
bordered by Trialeti range. The area is rich in water resources, rivers and
lakes. Apart of the biggest river Mtkvari, which flows for 18 km within the
district territory, its tributaries include Paravani, Murjakhetistskali,
Chaobareti and Baraleti. Small lakes can be found in almost all parts of the
district, the biggest among them the lakes of Zreski and Khozapini (Kartsakhi).
There are also swamps on Baraleti plain, in the vicinities of Vachiani,
Okami,Suldi, Kartsakhi, and Abuli settlements.
The climate is harsh and continental, that of highland steps,
characterized by cold winter with little snow and cool summer with little
precipitation. January is the coldest month of the year with average
temperature of –7 to –10 C. The hottest month is August, with average temperature
in the range of 14-16C. Average humidity is between 70-73%, annual
precipitation average varies between 500 and 700 mm. The maximum precipitation
occurs in June (90-100 mm.) and minimum in January (16-25mm.). Snow cover stays
on most of the territory between October and March. The soils are mostly
mountain black earth. Most of the terrain is devoid of bushes, trees or forests
(only 3.5% of the territory), covered predominantly by sub-alpine and alpine
meadows. More than 70% of the area, i.e. 90 thousand ha, are lands of
agricultural usage, about 35% of these made by pastures and hay lands, about
35% arable land, excellent for potato culture.
The district is bordering with Turkey and Armenia. From the town of
Akhalkalaki, it is 30 km distance from Turkish and 50km from Armenian
border. Roads are connecting
Akhalkalaki with Tbilisi via Tsalka
(172 km) and via Akhaltsikhe - 300 km.
Distance from Akhaltsikhe is 60km, also another gravel road goes via Borjomi
and Bakuriani bypassing Tabatsquri lake. There is also a railroad linking
Akhalkalaki with Tbilisi via Marabda, but it is hardly operational. There is
also an airfield in the neighbourhood of Akhalkalaki that is in need of
reconstruction.
2.3.Demographic structure and migration
Samtskhe-Javakheti
province, which occupies about 9.3% of Georgia's entire territory and accounts
for about 4.4% of its population, is among the most ethnically non-homogeneous
regions of Georgia, and some of current problems stem from this diversity.
Integrating the two major ethnic groups – Armenians and Georgians, represents a
major political challenge for the region. The ethnic composition is
characterized by clear-cut ethnic boundaries between different settlement
types, and the absence of major mixed ethnic settlements besides Akhaltsikhe:
there are very few ethnic-Georgian villages within Akhalkalaki region, but in
all cases the Georgian population is settled compactly and closely integrated
with local Armenian majority – practically all of them speak Armenian.
Similarly Armenian groups are as a rule compactly settled in the other regions
that have a Georgian majority. The only truly mixed region in
Samtskhe-Javakheti province is Akhaltsikhe.
Akhalkalaki district is dominated by ethnic
Armenians, who make up to 95% of the district (while they make approximately
40% of the population in Samtskhe-Javakheti region), others being mostly
Georgians, who are a small minority there. The population of Akhalkalaki
district is between 71,000 and 76,000, although precise data is hardly available
due to high migration rates and frequent cases of double or even triple
citizenship, although illegal. The district centre, town of Akhalkalaki, counts
about 13,000 to 15,000 residents. Armenians here mostly belong to Armenian
Apostolic (Gregorian) Church, with some Cathiolics, but unlike ethnicity
religion plays relatively little role in forming identity.
Part of Georgians here are resettled from Ajara
in 1989, after catastrophic landslides there, and these form a small relatively
young rural community, predominantly Muslim. Other Georgians, mainly Christian
Orthodox, are mostly living in the town, and play little role in the society.
Due to difficult economic conditions, many young males go to Russia in search
of work, in many cases seasonally, returning home for the winter. This causes
significant demographic disbalances, distorting the age and gender structure of
the local population, aggravated further by increasing emigration to Armenia
and Russia, especially of more educated and skilled young men. This partly
reduces land shortages, on one hand, and helps with cash inflow through
transfers, but negative consequences seem to be more conspicuous.
Significant part of the urban population in
Akhalkalaki are bilingual, speaking Russian in the first place and then
colloquial Armenian (often unable to read and write in that language), while in
the countryside Russian is much less known. However, the overwhelming majority
of Armenians in Akhalkalaki district, like as in neighbouring Ninotsminda, do
not speak Georgian at all, although it is supposedly taught in schools, and
show little interest in learning it. All ethnic Georgians here, in their turn,
speak fairly good Armenian. In addition to the language barrier, the area is
isolated from the rest of Georgia due to the lack of communication facilities
and both print and broadcast media, while Georgian TV, unlike Russian and
Armenian, generally cannot be received in Javakheti.
In Akhaltsikhe district with the population of
about 55,000, Georgians are playing much more important role here. Relative economic
prosperity of the town, its role as the administrative centre within the region
and its geographic location along major communications routes, mitigate
socio-economic problems and create conditions for quite effective cohabitation. Armenians in Akhaltsikhe district
speak better Georgian than in Javakheti, many Armenians living there
demonstrate fairly good command of it, but still even there the language skills
deficiency is still a very serious problem (especially among those who live in
14 predominantly Armenian villages) have problems with speaking Georgian.,
leading to informational and cultural isolation.
Georgians in Samtskhe-Javakheti belong partly
to Orthodox, partly to Catholic Church (apart of a small number of Ajaran
settlers in Akhalkalaki district who are Sunni Muslims), but like in the case
of Armenians, ethnicity and language are much more important in determining
identity. Intermarriages are quite common. In Akhaltsikhe there is also a very limited
number of Muslim Meskhetians (up to 100), who have repatriated in recent years,
but although the issue of repatriation is widely discussed, actual repatriation
is insignificant. Seasonal migration and emigration is less noticeable in
Akhaltsikhe district, partly due to better economic conditions and less
isolation, but also because of weak tradition of seasonal migration here. The
population of the town of Akhaltsikhe, which is both regional and district
centre, is c. 24,000, while the second biggest town of Vale counts around 5,000
residents. Akhaltsikhe (ancient name Lomsia) has quite old urban tradition, it
is mentioned as a town already in 12th century.
Javakheti, comprising of two districts of
Akhalkalaki and Ninotsminda is dominated by ethnic Armenians, who make up to
95% of Javakheti (while they make approximately 40% of the population in
Samtskhe-Javakheti region), others being mostly Georgians, who are a small
minority there. Armenians mostly belong to Armenian Apostolic (Gregorian)
Church, with some Catholics, but unlike ethnicity religion plays relatively
little role in forming identity.
Part of Georgians here are resettled from Ajara
in 1989, after catastrophic landslides there, and these form a small relatively
young rural community, predominantly Moslem. Other Georgians, mainly Christian
Orthodox and Catholic, play little role in the society. Due to difficult
economic conditions, many young males go to Russia in search of work, in many
cases seasonally, returning home for the winter. This causes significant
demographic disbalances, distorting the age and gender structure of the local
population, aggravated further by increasing emigration to Armenia and Russia,
especially of more educated and skilled young men. This partly reduces land shortages,
on one hand, and helps with cash inflow through transfers, but negative
consequences seem to be more conspicuous and longlasting.
Significant part of the urban population in
Akhalkalaki is bilingual, speaking Russian in the first place and then colloquial
Armenian (although often unable to read and write in that language), while in
the countryside Russian is much less known. However, the overwhelming majority
of Armenians in Akhalkalaki district, like as in neighbouring Ninotsminda, do
not speak Georgian, which is a state language, at all, although it is
supposedly taught in schools, and show little interest in learning it. All
ethnic Georgians here, in their turn, speak fairly good Armenian.
In Akhaltsikhe district with the population of
about 55,000, Georgians are playing much more important role. Relative economic prosperity of the town, its role as the administrative
centre within the region and its geographic location along major communications
routes, mitigate socio-economic problems and create conditions for quite
effective cohabitation.
More Armenians in Akhaltsikhe district speak Georgian than in Javakheti and
demonstrate fairly good command of it, but still even there the language skills
deficiency is still a very serious problem, leading to informational and
cultural isolation. Intermarriages are quite common.
In Akhaltsikhe there is also a very limited
number of Moslem Meskhetians (up to 100), who have repatriated in recent years,
but although the issue of repatriation is widely discussed, actual repatriation
is insignificant. Seasonal migration and emigration is less noticeable in
Akhaltsikhe district, partly due to better economic conditions and less
isolation, but also because of weak tradition of seasonal migration here.
3.Problems of the
region
3.1.Isolation
Now one of the least developed in the country,
Samtskhe-Javakheti was historically one of the most developed regions of
Georgia, and great number of cultural monuments, churches, citadels and karvasla-s (or karavan-sarays - ancient inns situated along the great silk road
passing the Mtkvari valley) serve as a vocal evidence of the past glory. It
differs from other parts of Georgia due to the experience of centuries of
isolation and multi-ethnic and multi-confessional composition. The southern
part of Samtskhe-Javakheti for some centuries belonged to Turkey, became
Islamised, and partly inhabited by nomadic Turkic tribes. In the first half of
the 19th c. the region was conquered by the Russian Empire, significant part of
the Moslem population were pushed out to Turkey, replaced by Armenians mostly
from Eastern Anatolia in Turkey. The remaining part of Moslem population (c.
100,000) were deported in 1944 by Stalin to Central Asia, never allowed to
return throughout the Soviet period. The majority of them were from
Akhaltsikhe, Aspindza, Adigeni districts, and about 10% from Akhalkalaki.
Soviet rule left other sad trace – Southern part of Georgia along the border
with Turkey was defined as so called “border zone” with special heightened
security regime, which precluded any person from outside the zone to enter it
without special permit. At the same time, the economic conditions were
maintained artificially slightly better than in other parts of the country.
This special “border” regime caused dramatic isolation, not yet overcome, and
on one hand brought economic decline, but on the other kept down criminality
and chaos. Due to such experience the region is more self-sufficient and is
less integrated into economic, political and cultural life of other parts of
the country.
With Georgia’s independence, in addition to
economic decline, dramatic emergence in interethnic tension was caused by
president Gamsakhurdia’s nationalist rhetoric, but never led to large-scale
violence. Another important event was the Karabakh conflict. Many young
Armenians from Akhalkalaki, led by patriotic feelings, have participated in the
conflict, and this experience continues to play significant role in forming
values and identities, and especially in strengthening anti-Moslem attitudes.
The last event, causing much dissatisfaction among Akhalkalaki Armenians, was
dividing of Georgia into 11 administrative regions, so that Akhalkalaki
district now belongs to Samtskhe-Javakheti region with capital in Akhaltsikhe.
Dissatisfaction is caused by mainly two points – the necessity to go to
Akhaltsikhe in order to solve some administrative issues, and the fact that
unlike Javakheti, i.e. Akhalkalaki and Ninotsminda districts, where Armenians
form absolute majority of the population and could aspire for autonomy, their
average share in Samtskhe-Javakheti is much more modest, around 40%. As a
result, there is ongoing demand for separating the two districts of Javakheti
from Samtskhe - i.e. Akhaltsihe plus the districts of Adigeni, Aspindza and
Borjomi. Inhabitants of Akhalkalaki and Ninotsminda districts reveal quite
strong adherence to traditional, patriarchal values and ways of life,
strengthened by decades of isolation. This is especially noticeable among the
Armenian population of Javakheti, particularly in such issues as gender roles.
Women play here secondary role in the society, and hardly ever are allowed to
express their opinion publicly. Compared to other regions of Georgia, there are
relatively few women involved in civil sector. Now, as more and more young
males go in search of work abroad, either seasonally or on permanent basis,
women started to play increasingly important social roles, but also are obliged
to undertake the double burden of raising the children and taking care of
subsistence farming.
Armenian-speaking districts of Javakheti
experience extreme informational, political, communicational and economic
isolation from the rest of Georgia. Lack of integration with the rest of
Georgia not only creates public alienation, weakening of the feeling of
citizenship and belonging, as well as security and confidence in future, but
also has highly adverse impact on civil and economic development of the area.
Poor knowledge of the Georgian language among ethnic Armenians, and little
willingness to integrate into the Georgian society due to practical
difficulties as well as elements of ethnic nationalism, contribute further to
isolation, underdevelopment and the risks of instability.
3.2.Attitude towards
Turkey and Islam
Both Turkey and Islam are looked at with
suspicion by the inhabitants of the whole region, Georgian and Armenian
communities alike. The Georgian inhabitants of Akhaltsikhe district to certain
extent preserve historic memories of being oppressed under Turkish Ottoman rule and remember atrocities related with
the Moslem population of the region, until their deportation in 1944. Georgians
in general are suspicious of Turkey’s intentions, keeping in mind centuries of
invasion. Such suspicione have been further aggravated during Soviet times,
when the special regime of the border zone had clear function of protecting
against hostile NATO member state.
Armenian population of Samtskhe-Javakheti, in
its turn, is traditionally much more hostile than ethnic Georgians toward
Turkey, and toward any Moslem groups like Moslem Meskhetians and Azeris who are
identified as closely related to Turks. The bitter memories of many cases of
interethnic violence in Turkey involving Armenians, especially the bloody
events of 1915, are extremely strong. Involvement of many Armenians from
Samtskhe-Javakheti in military action in Karabakh further revived such hostile
attitudes. It is the more so, that majority of Armenians in the region got
resettled from Turkey in 19th century, and still don’t feel themselves fully
comfortable on the territory, as revealed by repeated attempts to erase any
remains of Georgian inscriptions on old churches and other monuments and
attempts to prove their previous presence here. Due to the closeness of Turkish
border this sense of insecurity is even more strengthened, also supported by
the personnel of the Russian military base and Russian media.
Turkey is today the Georgia’s largest trading
partner, responsible for 22% of exports and 16% of imports (Russia is the
second with 21% of exports and 13% of imports). Javakheti has 80-90 km long
border with Turkey and can benefit from increasing trade. However, Armenians of
Javakheti look at the increasing cooperation of Georgia with Turkey, and also
with Azerbaijan, with great concern (e.g. Turkish military aid provided to
Georgia, especially 1.27 million dollars for reconstruction of military
airfield in Marneuli district, predominantly populated by ethnic Azeris).
Another similar concern is the construction of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline,
which is supposed to increase further Turkish influence and serve as an excuse
of its presence in Georgia..
The
planned 287 km long railway
connection of Tbilisi with Turkish town of Karsi via Akhalkalaki is another
great concern for Javakheti population. Kars-Tbilisi railway line project,
which is expected to contribute to the improvement of economic and trade
relations between Turkey and Central Asia, was included into the 2003 year
investment program of the Turkish government. Project and tender works are
expected to start in the coming weeks, with approximately 423 trillion lira of
mostly foreign investment expected. Following the completion of Kars-Tbilisi
railway line, railway transportation of Europe to the Caspian – Central Asian
region would be via Turkey.
3.3.Risk of ethnic
conflict
One
of the dividing lines between the government and Armenian community in
Javakheti is the issue of the closure of Russian military base. By Istanbul, 1999 agreement, 30 000
servicemen strong military base, stationed in Alkhalkalaki is to be closed.
Javakheti Armenian population strongly disagree with such solution as they see Russian base as defence from
much feared Turkish invasion and the as the sole employer for the inhabitants
of the district. In the situation of existing tensions situation becomes prone
to being sensitive toward external manipulation on all levels. Various actors
in the region often exploit popular fears associated with political and
economic insecurity. The crisis is likely to occur if the government fails to
develop and publicise in time a comprehensive package of economic and social
measures aimed at mitigating negative consequences of the base closure. The
demand of separating Javakheti from the Samtskhe-Javakheti region along
ethno-demographic lines and creating a political autonomy is one of bargaining
chips and leverages promoted if not induced from outside. There are other
opportunities for manipulation with potential interethnic tensions not only
from Yerevan, Ankara and Moscow, but also from illegal businesses and clans as
well as extremist nationalist organisations interested in preserving
uncertainty and disorder.
3.4.Repatriation of
Moslem Meskhetians
The issue of
repatriation of Moslem population which in 1944 was deported from
Samtskhe-Javakheti region to Central Asia and
now is spread over republics of Central Asia, Azerbaijan, Russia,
Ukraine and Georgia as well as Turkey arises much concern among the population
of the region. The aspirations of rank and file Meskhetians as well as numbers
of those who actually want to change their present place of residence are
unknown. While many claim that they want to return, such a claim may imply
having such option rather than denote actual readiness to leave home and start
a new life. On the other hand Georgia, as a condition of membership of Euro
Council took an obligation to repatriate Moslem Meskhetians in a period of 12
years, of which three already has passed.
Major fears and
concerns that reside at the heart of the popular opposition to the repatriation
are the following:
·
Fear
of Turkicization of the region and potential secessionist trends. People fear that after the
repatriation, the demographic balance changes dramatically and the whole
province will become predominantly Turkish and Moslem. In this scenario, the
Moslem Meskhetian are expected to
outnumber everybody else in the province of Samtskhe-Javakheti, demand autonomy
for it and eventually claim union with Turkey.
·
Fear
of ethnic tensions.
In the meetings and discussions residents of Samtskhe-Javakheti claim that in
case of attempts of repatriation
undertaken by the state, they will took to arms and would not allow Moslem
Meskhetians to enter the region. Stories of tension, bloodshed and atrocities
between the Moslems on the one hand and Christian Georgian and Armenian
population on the other hand during the 1918-21 period and afterwards are
widely discussed. The record of conflict between Turks and Armenians, and
general Armenian perception of historical victimization by Turkey, is an
additional factor of these fears.
·
Property
Those inhabitants
of Meskheti, who had been forcibly brought from different parts of Georgia and
settled in the houses of deportees in 1944 fear that repatriates will reclaim
their land and property.
·
Competition for scarce resources. Population
fears that with the influx their employment opportunities will be farther reduced. The deficiency of
land for agriculture will be aggreviated.
Despite
all that, in Samtskhe-Javakheti as well as in other parts of Georgia there are
examples of successful adaptation of those repatriates that had arrived
earlier.
3.5.Economic situation
Samtskhe-Javakheti
in Soviet times used to be a quite well to do region. The districts of
Akhaltsikhe and Akhalkalaki both enjoyed the special economic status specific
for border zones, which implied higher salaries than average in the country and
other benefits, huge Soviet market for local products, low prices and high
employment rate. Due to the region’s geographic location and its former status as of
closed military zone under the FSU, it was less integrated with other parts of
Georgia, and economically more dependant on other regions of the FSU,
especially Russia. During that time, many essential supplies were cheaply
provided by the state, and in turn local agricultural products were sold
throughout central Russia. Today, in both districts subsistence agriculture remains the main
occupation in the countryside, as most industrial enterprises are closed down,
with high unemployment in urban areas. Land privatisation left farmers with
mostly small plots of about 1-1.5 hectares, not allowing for effective
agriculture. Equally negatively production is influenced by little access to
seasonal credits, poor access to markets and lack of food processing industry.
Agriculture is the main income
generation means for the inhabitants. The main produce of the region is
potatoes, cabbage and fruit. The livestock breeding is also developed. But the
fragmentation of land, as a consequence of privatisation, lack of
mechanization, problems with irrigation and realization of produce do not allow
for full-fledged commercial farming, so that the production costs for some
products are even higher than for imported analogues. Still, the agricultural
potential of the region is significant. Even under current conditions, the
region produced (in 2001) 40.2% of all potatoes produced in Georgia, with the
highest yield of about 15.3 tonnes from a hectare, 5.1% of vegetables with 12.2
tonnes per hectare, 4.5% of wheat with 2.1 tonne per hectare, and 4.8% of maize
(2.2 tonnes); also, there are 8.4% of the whole number of cattle, 1.8% of pigs,
13.7% - sheep and goats, 12.3% of bee families, 5.4% of poultry. The region
contributed to 8.7% of the national production of meat, 10.2% of milk, 4.2% of
eggs, 21.4% of wool, and 13.8% of honey.
Currently,
official economic performance indicators in Javakheti, and Akhalkalaki in
particular, are poor and getting even worse, while Akhaltsikhe district, on the
contrary, is the best performer in the region. Akhaltsikhe is relatively well
connected with Tbilisi by a highway via Gori, Khasuri, and Borjomi. However, in
order to go to Akhalkalaki, it is easier to use the same road and then drive
some 60 km of poor road, than coming by much shorter route passing via
Ninotsminda and Tsalka, which is mainly gravel road in very poor condition.
Indeed, the road through Tsalka, designed to connect the region with the
capital, cannot be used and all traffic has to go through Akhaltsikhe and
Borjomi, around the minor Caucasus range instead of across it, making for a 6-7
hour journey, depending on weather and traffic. The horrible condition of the
roads, both local and of central, increases economic isolation.
In Akhaltsikhe, due to better
contact with the rest of Georgia, as well as with Turkish markets, and also
more natural resources and milder climate, situation is indeed somewhat better
than in Akhalkalaki. Especially the construction of Baku-Jeyhan Main Export Pipeline
(MEP) for transit of Caspian oil creates certain hopes and some cash inflow,
mainly as a compensation for landowners where the pipeline will pass. However,
industrial production continues to be very low, although previously the
district was known for its mining and other mineral resources (coal in Vale and
Naokhrebi, diatomite, agate - Shurdo and Pamaj-Ziareti mines, gypsum, other
building materials), as well as the renowned thermal sulphuric waters (near
village of Tsqaltbila), also Uraveli and Tsinubani mineral waters. There was
significant production of electric engines, cheese, meat, can and wool,
building materials, also a number of sawing mills. The dissolution of the
Soviet economic system resulted in the closure of all bigger scale industry in
the region, giving place to subsistence agriculture that is the main income
generation means for the inhabitants. The main produce of the region is
potatoes, cabbage and fruit, as well as dairy and meat from cattle breeding.
Travellers
to Akhalkalaki notice the low living standard of the population. Incomes have
dropped considerably even when compared to figures from the pervious years,
especially with strengthening the border control and introduction of visa
regime with Russia. This means both the general economic decline and the shift
of economic activity into shadow area. Since 1990, most of factories in
Akhalkalaki district have been closed down, and much of the equipment
disappeared. Previously, there was large cheese and fishing industry, clothing
and shoe manufacture, building materials, basalt, cement and timber processing,
and even production of aerial ropeway equipment. Today, most of remaining
activity consists of agricultural, fishery and livestock breeding at rather
small scale, including meat, dairy, wheat and potatoes, as well as some
bee-keeping, sausage, lemonade, pastry production and baking. Now only small
workshops are operating producing sausages and cheese. Today, the biggest
employer in the district is Russian military base.
As far as
the majority of local population in Akhalkalaki are involved in subsistence
agriculture, or in paralegal trade activities, there are very few businesses
that are formally incorporated. However, the scale of such activities remains
insufficient for any stable income, and although agriculture creates certain
self-sufficiency in food, the quality of life remains very low. High level of
unemployment forces large numbers of the male population to seasonally (or for
more prolonged periods) migrate to Russia, often returning to their families
only in the winter. Together with the presence of the Russian military base,
this is a major reason for the predominance of the Russian rouble rather than
the GEL on the local market. Local production, almost exclusively dependent on
agriculture, has suffered greatly from the dramatic change in the pricing
structure. A litre of milk, which previously could buy up to 5 litres of diesel
fuel, now is only sufficient for ten times less amount of fuel.
Isolation of the Javakheti province has contributed to
a profound economic decline in the Akhalkalaki region over the past decade,
which was further aggravated by poor supply of affordable electricity in the
region, and shrinking volume of cross-border trade and transit with Armenia and
Turkey. Widespread corruption among road police prevents access to markets, as
well as deterioration of irrigation systems and lack of quality seeds lead to
further decline in agricultural output. Food processing is accompanied by poor
sanitary conditions, especially among small private cheese producers which
otherwise is excellent. There are similar difficulties also with cross-border
trade with Armenia, where traders are harassed by multiple (mostly illegal)
customs points on the way to Armenia-Georgia border (frequently organized by
the locals themselves living nearby), while poor roads also limit the scale of
cross-border trade.
Many hopes are linked to the prospects of
turning Samtskhe-Jaakheti into transportation hub. Akhalkalaki is an important
location on the route for a prospective railroad to Kars, and a highway passing
through Kartsakhi border crossing and customs site. However, the routing was
chosen for the Baku-Ceyhan and Baku-Erzurum pipelines so that they do not pass
through Akhalkalaki district but via Borjomi, obviously for security reasons
related to the presence of the Russian base. Still, these pipelines are passing
through Akhaltsikhe, and are supposed to bring significant benefits to the
population there. All these transportation projects will definitely contribute
to the improvement of economic and trade relations between Turkey, Armenia and
Georgia, and to significant flows of goods from/to Central Asian Turkish
Republics. Following the completion of the Kars-Tbilisi railroad, railway
transportation from Europe to the region and further to Central Asia will
become fairly easy, while the second part of Kars-Tbilisi railway line, to be
completed in 2006, will reach Trabzon.
3.6.Social conditions
Widespread poverty and lack of resources,
together with general isolation from the centre cause many social problems,
although mainly do not differ in any significant way from those in other parts
of Georgia. These are primarily: declined and under-funded social services –
healthcare and education in the first place, high unemployment, power
shortages, problems with piped water and sewerage and resulting health
problems, informational deficiency, little opportunity for leisure activities
especially for the young, growing delinquency and little attention to disabled
and vulnerable. Often basic statistics may be misleading, as in accordance to
old tradition it is concentrated on inputs (such as number numbers of schools,
or hospital beds), not outputs. So, there are too many schools in the region,
but the pupil-teacher ratio is far from effective, while conditions are dire.
School buildings are dilapidated and in urgent need for repairs. During long
winter months there is difficult problem of insufficient heating, there is lack
of desks so that often three children sit at one desk instead of normal two.
Low incomes, subsistence economy of households and little awareness of healthy
nutrition needs resulted in the highest in Georgia rate of stunting (retarded
child growth due to chronic malnutrition) among the children of the
Samtskhe-Javakheti region. The situation is slightly alleviated by IOCC “Lunch project”, providing free lunch to 1-4
grades schoolchildren of the region.
In Akhalkalaki district there are 1700 teachers
teaching at 69 schools, among them 59 are Armenian, 9 are Georgian and 1 is
Russian. Out of 9 Georgian schools only one is in Akhalkalaki, all others are
in the villages with Georgian population. Textbooks for Armenian schools are
provided free of charge by Armenia, while for the Russian school - by Moscow
mayor’s office. The problem is with Georgian textbooks, which are quite
expensive, so that parents often cannot afford buying them. In addition, there
are 7 higher education institutions although no middle level technical education
facility. So, it is not the number of schools available, but rather the quality
of teaching and conditions that are causing concern. Actually, only now the
first initiatives assist in providing a few computers, earlier virtually
unavailable. Only one library – the resource centre supported by the British
Embassy functions in the district. In order to obtain high education, many of Armenian youth of
Akhalkalaki would go to Yerevan to continue studies, as poor knowledge of
Georgian would preclude them from studying in Tbilisi and other Georgian cities
with better schools. However, the opening here of Tbilisi State University
branch in September will probably have considerable impact on the situation, as
it had in Akhaltsikhe.
Poverty is overwhelming. Wages and pensions
still remain the main source of regular monetary income, therefore considerable
dependence on them. As everywhere else, pensions are miniscule comprising only
14 lari, not received regularly. Inhabitants of Akhalkalaki district complain
on the delays with pension and wage payments, amounting to 15 months of lag.
Administrations of many state agencies that no more operate would not dismiss
the employees being unable to pay out further accumulating debts. There are 620
lonely pensioners registered in the district, who depend on this scarce benefit
for their survival.
In Akhaltsikhe district there are 864 teachers
teaching at 46 schools, among them are 31 Georgian, 12 Armenian and 3 Russian.
There is also a boarding school for 50 retarded children, supervised and aided
by the university (TSU branch), with 18 teachers, however they rely on obsolete
methodology and materials. In addition, there are three higher education
institution that plays great role in the society. This is in the first place the
Akhaltsikhe Branch of Tbilisi State University, opening of which has
drastically changed the intellectual scene as well as demography of
Akhaltsikhe. University now has more than 2000 students who study at 8
departments, with 150 permanent pedagogical staff and about 40 visiting
professors from Tbilisi.
Accessing proper health care treatment is not
an easy task either in Samtskhe-Javakheti. Available facilities are also in
poor state. In Alkaltsikhe district there operate fifteen healthcare
institutions, all of them private, including three hospitals. However, no such
institution exists in Akhalkalaki district to be registered by the Ministry of
Labour, Health and Social. Residents of Akhalkalaki can go to the hospital in
adjutant Ninotsminda, one at the military base or further on to Akhaltsikhe.
However, in the case of serious health problems locals prefer to go to Armenia,
where not far from the border there functions an Italian hospital known for
high standards of service.
Neither in Akhalkalaki, nor in Akhaltsikhe are
there many opportunities for the leisure activities for the young people. There
are no cinemas, no computer or internet access, very few sports facilities,
next to no libraries. As a result, increased delinquency is observed.
Civil society is only starting to develop,
mostly with the assistance of the international organisations. It is not evenly
developing. In Akhaltsikhe NGO community, as well as independent media, are
much more numerous and active. This is due to more openness and better
communications, but also partly linked to the the existence of the university
(the TSU branch) which serves as a crystallisation centre for many civil
initiatives, also attractive active, educated young people. In Akhalkalaki,
possibly because of the location of the Russian base, international effort was
much more limited than even in neighbouring and much smaller Ninotsminda. Now,
however, the situation is developing. Another positive factor is the opening in
Akhalkalaki of the affiliated branch of the university in Akhaltsikhe.
3.7.Trust and citizenship
Many issues related to poor governance have
deep roots in general mistrust (mutual) between different layers and segments
of the society, partly based in the legacy of the Soviet past or first
post-independence years of total chaos, but further strengthened by malfunction
and corruption in the system. There is great suspicion toward central
authorities in Tbilisi, especially among minority groups, and fear of the
uncertain future. In their turn, authorities have no trust of the population in
general and the minorities in particular, ready to see a plot behind every
problem, and hence blaming the population or external forces for every policy
failures. Fortunately, the Armenian minority in Akhalkalaki would not see
nationalist conspiracy as a cause of every government failure, understanding
their generic reasons, but this may change with some populist manipulation and
become a real threat. At the same time, there is very weak feeling of belonging
and citizenship among the population whose ethnic identity is stronger,
especially among the Armenian minority of Akhalkalaki.
3.8.Civil society and civil culture
Development of the civil society is crucial for
the region. However, as yet non-government sector is weak institutionally,
financially and quantitatively. It is almost fully dependent on external
financing, while local sources of financing are practically non-existent. The
situation is especially difficult in Akhalkalaki district, where NGOs is by far
more underdeveloped than even in the neighbouring Ninotsminda. Lack of
political participation is also a problem there, partly related inability to
register ethnically-based political parties such as Virk. The feeling of
citizenship among minorities is virtually non-existent.
The role of communities and self-governance is
also progressively increasing, with some international organisations actively
supporting this process. However, their institutional development too,
notwithstanding high significance is still rudimentary.
One of the biggest problems is existence of
cultural stereotypes, which makes the society inert and impedes establishment
of the system of values oriented on civic responsibility, democracy and free
market. For instance, gender inequality and social passivity of women,
migration misbalance, requirements of labour market and devastation of social
infrastructure raised the issue of changing traditional gender roles. Another
issue of great importance is lack of attention to youth-related issues, amid
growing juvenile delinquency, trafficking and
4.Conclusions
Future of the region depends primarily on the
initiative of the population itself, but external interventions and policies
can do a lot in promoting development, stability and democracy in Samtskhe-Javakheti.
With the growing interest toward the development of the region both within the
country and internationally, it is important to reflect on elaborating a
clear-cut list of strategic priorities for intervention, understand the
feasibility of planned initiatives and compare to other policy options. Also,
as much of support is coming from international sources, these should be
translated into universally accepted and comprehensible objectives and goals.
·
Overcoming
isolation - achieving social,
communicational, economic and political integration of all parts of the region
into the Georgian society and state
·
Creating
conditions for every ethno-cultural group living in the region to preserve its
identity, language and culture, as well as to preserve links with related
groups
·
Providing
conditions for implementation of justice both toward the deported and repressed
groups of the population (Moslem Meskhetians) and the current residents of the
region
The
activities of the Centre for Social Partnership are aimed to tackle the
outlined problems.
5.The centre for Social Partnership
In
order to prevent ethnic conflict and promote a happy co-existence of different
Ethnic groups in Georgia and promote regional development, there is an
urgent need in overcoming the
isolation, in sharing the concerns and hopes, inspirations and life of the rest of population of Georgia.
Just living next to Georgian community
without appropriate policy and the goal directed actions of the
government did not result in integration of ethnic minorities. Clash of
interests of states at the border zone
creates a serious threat of igniting interethnic conflict. The sole instrument
to prevent such possible development is bringing close to each other Georgian, Armenian and Moslem Meskhetian
communities, fostering feeling of citizenship and building cooperation. Next to
the existence of state policy the instruments for the realization of such a
policy is needed. The Centre for Social Partnership is intended to be one of such
instruments.
The center is conceived as the meeting place for different cultures. It is intended to be opened in Javakheti and in Tbilisi. The courses offered at the center, round tables, discussion, video, audio and printed material of informational character, will all serve the aim of increasing cross-cultural understanding:
· Courses. The center will offer courses of Georgian language. The courses in law, human rights, healthy life-style will also function.
· Consultations. The center will offer legal assistance through consultations, publication of main laws and regulations and their interpretations in Armenian and Azeri languages.
· Resources. Resource center will provide the information on Georgia, its history, geography, culture and laws as well as the information on culture, history and present day of Armenia and Turkey.
· Meetings. The center will become a meeting place for representatives of different cultures. Round tables and discussions will be held for expressing the positions and gaining understanding in the views of representatives of Georgian, Moslem Meskhetian and Armenian communities. The information about the history of the region, deportation of Moslem Meskhetians, their life in deportation and afterwards will be presented. Eventually the meetings of local population with Moslem Meskhetians will be organized.