THE PROPOSED STUDY ON THE ROLE OF
POOR GOVERNANCE IN THE TANZANITE-AL QAEDA LINK CONTROVERSY AND
POLICY OPTIONS FOR TANZANIA TO RESTRAIN CURSES IN THE MINING
INDUSTRY
The aim of this study is to
investigate and examine level and causes of resource curse and
initiate pro-poor policy changes for improving governance in
handling the mining industry, especially investments in the sector.
Emphasis will be placed on Foreign Direct Investment (FDIs). In all
cases, to be studied include governance systems in mining industry
and its institutions. Evaluation on mineral policy, mineral act and
fiscal package, is part of this study. This is to broaden the scope
of anti-curse strategies, providing governance institutions in the
public, local governments, public sector, civil society and faith
organization, be alerted to engage in the process. This study
expects to finally recommend measures towards improving governance
in both a policy paper and the entire publication of findings. There
are at least five set of questions in this study. They include why
crisis in the Tanzanite industry, how and why Tanzanite has been
linked with Al Qaeda Group, Is it Al Qaeda link which curses the
Tanzanite or just syndicate of dealers like Mafia group, to what
extent poor governance in handling FDI is contributing to curses of
Tanzanite alongside other minerals and, last which could be the
policy options to address the entire problem? The central hypothesis
is that poor governance is the central setback.
Finally, this fuller research
considers the installation of good governance as an optimal tool to
overcome resource curse in mining for Tanzania. It does not claim
that this is the last and only option, but believes that more
alternative options would be established in the study. Another
possible option might be deciding to involve sector case, especially
from Botswana. This research aim to turn this problem into an issue
and influence stakeholders and the public to fight the vice after
making thorough investigations, analyzing investment, studying
administrative or institutional systems, policies, contracts and
procedures in handling FDI. It is planned that advocacy and
information dissemination campaigns will thereafter be launched to
share the findings.
|
|