|
Representation of
Islam in the Russian and Tatar Mass Media
Discriminatory
materials addressing Muslims have become a rather
widespread practice for the Russian media. The
negative stereotyping of Muslims associates them with
aggression,
unpredictability and danger. The
attitude towards followers of Islam makes up a significant share of
intolerance
in present-day Russia. Media not only foster this negative attitude but also
provoke
discriminatory practices in their audiences. Besides, their materials
infringe
on the honor and dignity of Muslims. At
the present time there is no societal mechanism that could ensure a
workable
interaction of the government, the civil society, and the media to
resolve
these problems.
This
project investigated the legal aspects of media activity in
coverage of religion and journalists’ attitudes to Islam.
I chose four cases to study: the hostage
crisis in Moscow in October, 2002; the war in Iraq; the
struggle of Muslim women for the right to have their ID pictures taken
in
scarves ("the hijab case"); and celebration of the Muslim feast of
Kurban Bairam. I used the method of
content analysis of all-Russian and Tatarstan newspapers and magazines
(2002-2004). I also took in-depth
interviews with Muslim clerics and journalists. The
final stage of the project was a round table “Islam
and mass media”
(June, 2004, Kazan).
My
content analysis has revealed that journalists often make
unsubstantiated conclusions and judgments based on their rather
superficial
analysis of the problems concerning Islam and Muslims.
They thirst for sensation and inaccurately
apply the Islamic terminology. Consequently,
the image of Islam created by mass-media is
typically
associated with danger and threat. Despite
a low number of overtly xenophobic materials
concerning Muslims,
the press broadcasts Islamophobic attitudes through headlines or
journalistic
comments. Foreign Muslims are typically
presented as radical, stigmatized characters, with virtually no
information
about their positive activities. The
“image of the enemy” has been constructed — even the image of a Muslim
woman,
once stereotypically far from fearsome but rather traditionally
feminine and
humble, has been transformed into a potential hostage-taker. The exaggerated attention to female kamikazes
presented by the Russian mass media during the Dubrovka hostage-crisis
in Moscow (2002) was
caused partly by lack of information on the true masterminds behind the
hostage
taking and by self-censorship resulting from a desire to avoid
politicizing the
subject of the Russian-Chechen opposition.
(Kouznetsova-Morenko I. (2006) Muslims in the Russian and Tatarstan Media:
Prospects for
Media Policy Promoting Tolerance. In Policy
Perspectives: Islam and
Tolerance in Wider Europe).
A round table discussion my colleagues and I organized
at the Kazan House of Journalists uncovered a number of constraints in
the
media for democratic dialogue and problem resolution with respect to
Muslims
and Islamic issues. They include the
following: 1) the journalistic community does not follow a common code
of
ethics; 2) local journalists, who are often poorly educated act as the
conduits
of political statements and policies rather than defenders of freedom
of
speech; 3) journalists lack both education and practical experience in
understanding and working with Muslims; 4) there are no local
institutes which
assist in the implementation of media policies and recommendations of
the
Russian Union of Journalists Grand Jury; and 5) significant prejudice
exists in
relation to the Muslim clergy. (Kouznetsova-Morenko I.,
Salakhatdinova, L. (2004) Islam v
mediinom prostranstve. (Islam in
mass-media space). Kazan: Kazan State University)
Acknowledgements
The
author is grateful to mentors Milica
Pecis (Director of Media Diversity Institute, London),
Prof. Renat Nabiev (Chair of
Religious State Affair) for their valuable advices and mentoring. The
author thanks Dr.
Leissan Salakhatdinova (Kazan State Medical
University) for
her contribution to my research. The author also
grateful to IPF
program staff, IPF trainers and Center for Policy Studies at CEU.
Contact Information
morenko@policy.hu.
[<<
back]
|
Current projects·
Comparing societal
integration of
Turkish and related minorities: institutional strategies in INTAS and
NIS
countries. (INTAS, leader Prof. N. Genov, Free University of Berlin,
2004-2006)
|
Life
strategies of graduates of Tatars schools (Russian
Foundation for
Humanities, 2006-2008, leader Dr. L. Mukharyamova)
|
Social
Policy in a context of transformations of the
Russian society: ideology and reality of social reforms (Saratov Centre
for Social Policy and
Gender Studies, supported
by Macarthur Foundation,
2006-2007) |
Right
to the living in a society: mechanisms
of educational integration of children with
disability (with Saratov
Centre
for Social Policy and
Gender Studies, Crisis Centre “Fatima”,
supported by IREX, 2006-2007)
|
Completed
projects
|
Social
Policy in public health
services in Delimitation of Budgetary Powers
in the Republics of Mariy El and Tatarstan (2006, Independent Institute of
Social Policy, leader Dr. L.
Mukharyamova)
Demography
development in multiethnic regions: the
example of Tatarstan
Republic
(2003-2004, Russian
Foundation for Humanities;
leader Dr. A. Shikhalev)
|
|
|
Non-Russian
language of schooling as a
differentiating factor in access to higher education (the
case of Republic
of Tatarstan), (October
2002 – August 2003, Independent
Institute of Social Policy, Ford
Foundation, leader Dr. L. Mukharyamova)
|
|
New
identity forming among youth in Tatarstan under
influence of process of Islamization (01.01.2001-12.31.2001, Russian
Foundation
for Humanities)
|
|
Islamization
process in Tatarstan: the influence on
stability in the society and new identity forming among youth
(07.01.2000
–12.31.2001, Group Research Support Scheme Grant of Open Society
Institute, leader
Dr.
Mansurova G.).
|
|
|