Center for Policy Studies

International Policy Fellowships

Nador utca 11, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary

Your name, position Roman Y. Korinets, Strategic Area Manager, the Coordinating Council on the Agrarian Policy, under the Cabinet of Ministries of Ukraine

Name of Fellow you have assisted Andrei Marusov

1. What, in your opinion, have you and your Fellow/program/project gained from your cooperation thus far?
I received an opportunity to consider the issue of the information support of the land and agrarian reforms from the standpoint of the Fellow. I believe that the research of the role and potential of the rural raion mass media for informing rural population about land and agrarian reforms has been especially useful for both of us. I will have to come back to its results in order to rethink them thoroughly. I am confident that the Fellow gained very important experience of not only analyzing the governmental policy but of thinking over practically feasible measures to be implemented, in order to make the research relevant to decision-makers.  

2. Do certain areas of this Fellow’s work need improvement? Which areas?
Yes, some of them do: it is necessary to strengthen the planning and organization of the research. In such cases, to my mind, the methods of mathematical analysis should be more broadly used.

3. In your opinion, does your Fellow’s project make a significant contribution to the field?
Those who have an information – govern the world. The peasant who knows something – is not yet the peasant who can do something but, at least, he knows how to reach the stage when he will be able to do it. And it means that he knows how to become more competitive, more entrepreneurial and more well-off. The Fellow’s project will assist in rethinking an existing information policy and to build more effective new one, if it will be necessary. 
  
4. Would the project be important to other countries in the CEE/fSU region?

I guess that the project will be important for other postsoviet countries because they are still similar.

5. Could the proposed policy research make an impact on the policy environment in specific countries or regions? (Policy makers, experts and policy research community)
After the project completion the work on the problem under consideration will not be over. We agreed with the Fellow to continue the research with the purpose to come up with the proposals for the government of Ukraine. The deeper analysis of the local printed mass media will, perhaps, allow for developing recommendations for the given regions. 
  
6. Is the timetable for the project realistic?
The most part of the timetable has been realistic. Though, the survey of raion newspapers' editors negatively influenced its implementation. It is necessary to take into account excessive caution of the editors because they depend too much upon the local authorities from which they receive the very significant financial assistance. 
  
7. Could the project benefit a large number of people?
It is unlikely that the project per se will do. But effective decisions, being developed and implemented on the basis of the research results, will have the chance to benefit large number of people.
  
8. Does the Fellow show evidence that he/she can think strategically about the relevant project and/or field?
Yes, he can think strategically though he does not have enough experience to think in practical terms.
  
9. If the Fellow were to re-apply for continued OSI funding for follow-up work associated with the project, would you support continued funding?
Yes, I would support, under the condition of increasing the planning and proper timing of the research.

10. Are there other appropriate funders that may support the project?
As far as I know, the projects close to this issue (or being the part of more broad projects) are supported by many international organizations, including USAID, TACIS, DFID, World Bank, etc.