Istileulova Elena
International Policy Fellow 2003
During the Soviet system an official poverty and unemployment did not exist in Kazakhstan though there was a narrow circle of low-income people. The break-up of the Soviet Union and transformation towards the market economy took place in the country after the 90s with the reformation of the ownership forms and the changes in the social and labor relations. These processes were accompanied by hyperinflation, closure of many enterprises, and drastic decrease in GDP. Due to the absence of the appropriate protection system covering all the society groups a new social phenomenon such as unemployment has occurred. Poverty and unemployment appeared as a multiple-factor phenomenon which could not be confronted by the society facing the crisis in economy and lacking the efficient mechanisms of the social policy. Recession has led to the reduction in employment, and women were a first group of those who lost the jobs. Other countries’ experience proves that usually women are not integrated into the labor market as well as men. They generally have less regular and secure jobs and carry more of the burden of care for children and other dependants, which mean that there are some gender problems in the labor markets. In Kazakhstan the principle of equal rights and equal opportunities is guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Paragraph 2 of the Article 14 of the Constitution says: “No one can be subject to any form of discrimination on the basis of origin, social status, job position or property ownership, gender, race, nationality, language, religious affiliation, belief, place of residence or any other kind of distinction”. But in a real life, economic and social turmoil of transition affected Kazakhstan women at most. Women of Kazakhstan faced the challenges of economic inequality, changing environmental conditions and domestic violence in the middle of 1990s. Deteriorating social infrastructure, decreasing amount of pre-school and nursing establishments, absence of child-care facilities in the workplace negatively affect the social status of women. In terms of unemployment, women became the most vulnerable group in the labor market of Kazakhstan at middle and the end of 90s. According to the CIS Statistical Committee, out of 10 fired people in Kazakhstan, 8 of them were women. Because women’s income in the family’s budget accounts for about 40%, it means that the family is becoming poorer in the case of loosing a job. Although women account for more than a half of the Kazakh population, their rights suffer more often than those of men. This could be observed in all spheres of both political and economic life of our society. This paper is concentrated on economic rights of men and women in the labor market. Men constituted 48,16% and 49,44% of the total population in 1989 and 1999 respectively. Average monthly nominal salary rate for females to salary rate for males in 1998 year was 75.7%. At the beginning of the 21st century, economic situation has been improving a lot compare to other Central Asian countries, but despite Kazakhstan’s higher level of GDP (per capita $1, 506 in 2001) than its neighbors, salary rate for females were decreasing, - women receive less than 70 percent of men’s wage. Prior to the transition, earnings and benefits were the main source of income and property and individual ownership were rare. In the past decade, however, the privatization restructuring of productive resources has transformed the economic landscape, and women in Central Asia are often the last to benefit, in part because of the traditional customs whereby men de facto own most property. Another barrier women face in the growing private labor market is the form of access to credit, where evidence suggests considerable gender differences. Gender specific barriers include limited access to networks, financing and markets, which reflect a gender biased privatization process. Women’s businesses are usually small or micro-enterprises, which indicate that many women became self-employed only due to the lack of other job opportunities. During the Soviet era, the significance of women as mothers and workers was greatly emphasized by the government. It is undeniable that great progress was made in many aspects of women's life. Healthcare, paid ma¬ternity leave and numerous kindergartens, for example, all testify to this. In a break with tradition and Islamic norms, women gained custody of their children after divorce. Because of greatly improved healthcare, women made up over half of the population for the first time. The literacy rate of women in Soviet times was almost 100 per cent. The majority of doctors, chemists and biologists in Central Asia were women, a feature unusual even in many western countries. The high level of women's employment was proclaimed as a supreme achievement of developed socialism although at the same time scarce social bene¬fits for mothers, employment of women in manual and heavy jobs and poor pro¬gress in social questions led to above average high burdens on women. There are some new features that have appeared in the labor market of Kazakhstan since the end of 1990s that have to be taken into account under policy’s recommendations: - the old model of the sole breadwinner having someone at home taking care of his children and private life is not the norm any more. With the occurrence of a market economy, there has been a serious shift towards a dual breadwinner model - women are more involved into a small business and become a very successful entrepreneurs - since the social support system in Kazakhstan has been gradually reduced after its independence (after 1991 year), women started to work on the equal conditions with men and have family responsibilities combining with their responsibilities in the labor market. - A strong performance of SME has raised interest in many countries of the former Soviet Union to strengthen their SME sector - The decline in public employment and the growth of a highly unregulated and informal private market for labor - The old centralized system of wage setting has been replaced by a more decentralized system of plant negotiations or collective bargaining. Therefore, the relevant strategy should exist today in a labor market to achieve the goal of gender equality, especially in a private business Focus on equality of opportunities is focused on two things: first, equality of outcome’s across gender reflects a particular view of gender “equity” or fairness, and second, equity requires men and women to be free to choose different roles and outcomes, depending on their preferences and their comparative advantage in performing different activities. Inequality of opportunities and unequal treatment across gender often refereed to as gender discrimination. Stakeholders and Policies In terms of the stakeholders there are the most influential in terms of decision making and policy recommendations, which are - Center for Gender Studies - City Akimats of Development of Small Business - Association of women-entrepreneurs - Associations of professional entrepreneurs - Ministry of Labor and Social Protection - Representation of International Labor Organisation (2 people only) - UNDP Gender Bureau “Women in Development” - Association of Small Businesses - USAID project of Pragma Corporation on Support to the SMEs - Other donors organizations’ efforts (EBRD, Tacis, ADB, UNDP, OSCE, NATO, etc.) The meetings with majority of these listed organizations took place that show that the big efforts and money were allocated for the program of support for small businesses, but the situation has not been improved. The government itself does not allocate money to support the small business, despite different promises. Banks provide money thanks to the donors’ programs of EBRD, but the interest rate is very high (more than 18% - at the beginning and middle of 2003 prior to the devaluation of US dollar) and entrepreneurs are reluctant to take any opportunities in this respects. The program that was initiated by the ADB, was very limited, directed only to the rural sector of economy, and was not successful. There is a suggested Gender Mainstreaming strategy for Central Asia for 2002-2005 developed by the ILO that have to be reflected in all policies’ documents. Conclusion and recommendations: The paper concludes that women’s entrepreneurial potential in transition countries remains largely untapped especially when compared to global trends. Gender asymmetry requires more attention o f Government and policy makers to achieve equal opportunities for men and women in the labor market and fully utilize human resources for economic growth. This requires political commitment, development of support measures focused on women entrepreneurs and building partnership among all stakeholders at national, regional and international levels. A gender equality strategy is recommended to include all relevant policies and programs. If this strategy exists only in the labor market, and it doesn’t embrace the other sectors like health, education, nutrition, social protection, it may not work. The situation can be tacked efficiently only by integrating the gender equality objectives into the policies that have a direct or indirect impact on the lives of women and men. Gender equality in Kazakhstan can be promoted either by introducing the pro-active intervention: gender mainstreaming or by implementing reactive intervention: the specific actions designed to improve the situation of women in society. In general, this strategy should be based on the following objectives: - to advance women’s leadership and governance positions - to promote women’s entrepreneurship, and to facilitate women’s equal access to resources, employment, markets and trade Women’s concerns and needs should be taken into account and assume that the same importance as men’s concerns in the design and implementation of policies - It is evident that the narrow definition of work does not capture the reality of work for women. The first recommendation is related to economic decision-makers at the level of the Ministry of Labor market and social protection on defining work to incorporate the full scope of women contribution to the national product, making visible the economic value of unpaid social reproduction and social capital. The unpaid work of women has to be taken into consideration when determining resource allocation, compensation, and benefits for both women and men. The explicit redefining of work to include women’s work is a major step towards meeting the United Nations goals of gender equality and equity. - Assistance for women’s entrepreneurship and self-employment through the development of different governmental programs. The measures on women’s support are to be introduced to the government programs of support for the small business and the development of the special chapter for women’s entrepreneurship in the State program of employment - The system of Microcredits are to be introduced in both urban and rural areas. This system has to be introduced as programs that extend small loans and other financial and business services to very poor people for self-employment projects that generate income allowing them to care for themselves and their families. Since women are suffering from unemployment and underpayment, but banks won’t lend credits without collateral, it would be better to use a powerful tool to help transition economies recover and strengthen - System of the trade unions is recommended at the level of state enterprises where the level of salaries is considered to be the lowest in the country - Work is broadly defined to include all activities and efforts, remunerated or non-remunerated, needed to achieve an object or result. - The government must also ensure that women’s interests are represented in a collective bargaining effort in the workplace, through the presence of trade unions. - Introduction of the Equal Opportunity programs at enterprise level - Women’s business associations and other NGOs by each industry of economy have to be developed with the assistance of donor organisations - The network of credit unions Bibliography: 1. Disparities Between Men and Women in Transition Countries of Europe and Central Asia Merit Special Attention, Washington, September 18, 2002. 2. The OECD Observer, January, 1999 N 215; http://www.oecd.org/publications/observer 3. Jorg Meyer-Stamer and Frank Waltring, August 2000; Behind the Myth of the Mittelstand Economy. The Institutional Environment Supporting Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Germany; http://www.oecd.org/els/women/women.htm 4. Teri G. Lindgren and Afaf I. Meleis, March 2001; Institute on Global conflict and Cooperation. Women, Work, Health, and the quality of life 5. Daniel Sommerstein Development Projects to Promote Economic Empowerment of Women, 50th Sessions issues 6. Î íåêîòîðûõ ïðîáëåìàõ çàíÿòîñòè æåíùèí â ñòðàíàõ ÑÍÃ. Âñåîáùàÿ Êîíôåäåðàöèÿ ïðîôñîþçîâ. http://www.vkp.ru/doc/7.thml 7. Kazakhstan Development Gateway http://www.women.kz/pub/pub0003.htm 8. Towards a Community Framework Strategy on Gender Equality (2001-2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions. Brussels, 2000/0143 (CNS) 9. Global Gender Programme. http://www.sdnp.undp.org/gender/programmes/empowerment_strategy.html 10. Transition Newsletter about reforming economies, How do Men and Women Fare in Transition countries? Pierella Paci, World Bank, 2002 11. Dr. Ewa Ruminska-Zimny, Women’s entrepreneurship in transition countries. UNECE, Geneva, Switzerland, June 15-18; 2003