Introduction Chapter I. Normative Theories and Models of Nationhood I. 1. Normative Theories I. 1. 1. Two Contradictory Principles of the Liberal Nation State I. 1. 2. Libertarianism I. 1. 3. Liberalism I. 1. 4. Communitarianism I. 1. 5. Realism I. 1. 6. Grounds for Openness and Restrictiveness I. 2. Nationhood Models I. 2. 1. Four Ideal Types I. 2. 2. The Immigrant Civic Nation: USA I. 2. 3. The Endogenous Civic Nation I. 2. 3. 1. Assimilationist Republic: France I. 2. 3. 2. Pluralistic Empire: Great Britain I. 2. 4. The Endogenous Ethnic Nation: Germany I. 2. 5. The Immigrant Ethnic Nation: Israel Chapter II: Western Experiences II. 1. USA II. 1. 1. Immigration Policies II. 1. 2. Integration Policies II. 1. 2. 1. Ethnic Pluralism II. 1. 2. 2. Racial Pluralism II. 2. France II. 2. 1. Immigration Policies II. 2. 2. Integration Policies II. 2. 2. 1. Assimilatory Integration II. 2. 2. 2. Islam II. 3. Great Britain II. 3. 1. Immigration Policies II. 3. 2. Integration Policies II. 3. 2. 1. Pluralistic Integration II. 3. 2. 1. 1. Official Multiculturalism II. 3. 2. 1. 2. “Race Relations” and Anti-discrimination II. 3. 2. 2. Islam II. 4. Germany II. 4. 1. Immigration Policies II. 4. 1. 1. Ethnic State as a Country of Immigration II. 4. 1. 2. Asylum Debate II. 4. 2. Integration Policies II. 4. 2. 1. From Ethnic to Civic Nationhood II. 4. 2. 2. Islam Chapter III: Convergence of European Policies and EU Framework III. 1. Three Waves of Post-War Migration to Western Europe III. 2. Last Developments in France III. 3. Last Developments in Britain III. 4. Last Developments in Germany III. 5. Convergence of National Policies III. 6. Common EU Framework for Migration and Asylum Policy III. 6.1. EU Labour Migration Policies III. 6.2. EU: Integration Policies III. 6.3. EU: Trends and Prospects Chapter IV: Czech Republic IV.1. Immigration Policies IV.2. Integration Policies IV.3. Active Immigration Policies IV.4. Migration Strategy of 2003 V: Conclusions and Recommendations Appendix: Explanatory Theories. An Overview 1. Neo-classical Economics 2. The New Economics of Migration 3. Dual Labour Market Theory 4. World-Systems Theory 5. Migration Networks Theory 6. Cumulative Causation Theory 7. Institutionalist Theory 8. Client Politics Theory References Tables Boxes |
immigrant-settler |
endogenous |
|
civic |
USA |
France, Britain |
ethnic |
Israel |
Germany |
Box III.1 France: New Integration Policy Plan of the Ministry of Social Affairs, Labour and Solidarity of 8 December 2003: Notre politique d´intégration Ministere des Affaires sociales, du Travail et de la Solidarité, 8 decémbre 2003 Integration is not only the task for immigrants or the French of foreign origin. It is the task for all living in France. Integration policy is directed toward three areas: (1) establishing the procedures of the integration of new immigrants, (2) support of individual social and professional advancement and (3) acting against intolerance and in support of equality of rights. The project for the establishing of the mechanism of integration is ambitious. It involves three elements: > Introducing a public service of reception. In 2004, a new central agency for reception shall be established, as well as a network of regional centres for reception, which shall cover all the territory. > Creation of a “reception and integration contract”, which will be proposed personally to all newcomers. The contract shall offer immigrants the language education and other training. The immigrant has to agree to participate in the prescribed courses and promise to respect the values of the Republic (democracy, secularity, the equality of men and women). > Coherent measure to provide support for incoming families. In 2003, the programme was introduced as a pilot programme in 12 French departments. By 1 January 2006, the new policy shall include all new immigrants and all departments. Sources: http://www.travail.gouv.fr http://www.migrationinformation.org, authors of articles:
Sylvia Zappi and Patrick Simon
|
Box III.2 UK: Highly Skilled Migrant Programme HSMP was launched as a pilot project in January 2002 and revised in October 2003, when it was turned into a permanently operating immigration scheme. The programme targets exceptional individuals who should help the UK to compete in the global economy. It allows “highly skilled individuals” to seek entry to work in the UK without having a prior offer of employment, or to take up self-employment opportunities. To make a successful application, the applicant has to score 65 points or more. The points are awarded for education, work experience, past earnings and personal achievements in the chosen field. For instance, the PhD. rates 30 points, Master's 25 and Graduate Degree 15. Past earnings also play an important role. For this purpose, all countries are divided into A-E categories. For instance, an applicant coming from countries rated as “B” (e.g. New Zealand, Argentina or the Czech Republic) gets 25 points for a year income of £ 17 500, 35 points for income of £ 43 750 and 50 points for £ 109 375 if he is 28 and over. After the revision, the programme sets modified criteria for young applicants under 28. Skilled partners (a spouse or a long-term partner) are also taken into account (10 points). The immigration status and the country of origin of the applicant do not play a role, individuals residing in the UK and abroad may apply. All applicants must declare they are willing and able to make UK their main home. (To qualify for permanent settlement in the UK, the accepted applicant must have spent a continuous period of four years in the UK.) Source: http://www.workpermits.gov.uk Home Office. Immigration and Nationality Directorate. Highly Skilled Migrant Programme (HSMP). Revised Programme effective from 31 October 2003. London: Author. |
Box III.3 Germany: Law to Amend the Law on State Citizenship of 15 June 1999 According to the amended legislation, as of 1 January 2000, children born to foreign parents in Germany will acquire German nationality provided that at least one of the parents had been living in Germany legally for at least 8 years. However, if the child holds dual citizenship, German and that of the country of origin of his parent, he or she is requested to make a choice. If he chooses German nationality, he has to give up the other nationality, at the latest when he reaches 23 years. The reform makes it also easier for adult foreign residents who wish to acquire German nationality. Now they have a right to acquire German nationality after they had been living in Germany for at least 8 years. Before, the period was 15 years. The eligible applicant has to demonstrate knowledge of German and of the German constitution. The reform extended the toleration of dual nationality in certain specific personal circumstances, which also includes the toleration of dual nationality of some applicants, for instance for elderly persons. Immigrants of German origin acquire German nationality ex lege, without undergoing the bureaucratic procedure. Source: Gesetz zur Reform des Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht vom 15 Juli 1999. |
Box III.4 Germany: Green Cards Programme for Foreign IT Specialists The “green card programme” for foreign IT specialists was introduced by a decree (Verordnung) of the Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs as a pilot project limited to 3 years. In 2003, it was extended. (The extension was partly, due to the delays in adopting the new immigration legislation.) The programme allowed for issuing 20,000 work permits for foreign IT specialists from countries outside the EU without individual proof that there is a vacancy that cannot be filled by the domestic labour force. The work and residence permit is issued for 5 years. To qualify, the applicant has ether to have completed a university education in IT or to have an offer of a job in the sector for no less than 51,000 euro a year. The programme is also open for foreign graduates at German universities. In the first 3 years, 13,566 “green cards” were issued. Most of the IT specialists came from India and Russia. The programme has not met the high expectations of the businesses. Yet, it is considered generally to be a successful test for introducing other immigration schemes concerning branches of the global economy. The main obstacle to a more intense interest of potential “IT immigrants” is the limitation of the work permit. Many critics believe that the top experts prefer countries which offer more durable settlement options. The language is also a barrier, as well as the inflexible bureaucracy and – as some observers add – the not very welcoming attitudes of the local population. Critical voices also stress that the crisis in the IT branch resulted in 7% of the recruited IT specialists being unemployed. Every fifth expert lost his job in the first year at least one time. According to these critics' opinions, such narrowly tailored programmes cannot react flexibly to the changing situation in the various sectors of the labour market: while the demand for IT specialists dropped, Germany is short of skilled workers in the health sector. Sources: http://www.bmi.bund.de; http://www.aufenthaltstitel.de (commentary from the German Media) |
Box III.5 Germany: The Proposed New Immigration Law (“Zunwanderungsgesetz”) The law is based on the new premise: Germany is a country of immigration and therefore it must develop and apply a mechanism to structure immigration. For the first time, one piece of legislation shall cover the stay of foreigners as well as employment issues, so far regulated by other laws. The reform represents a significant contribution to the need for simplification and transparency of the legislation. The wide range of permits shall be reduced to two types: the temporary residence permit and the permanent settlement permit. The number of grounds for granting the temporary residence permit and the permanent settlement permit should be also limited (i.e. education, gainful activity, family reunification and humanitarian reasons. Three institutions shall be responsible for migration issues: the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (as an umbrella and executive organ), the Federal Institute for Population Research and an independent Commission of Experts for Immigration and Integration, which should issue annually an opinion concerning the need for immigration and the quotas. In the field of work migration, three regimes should exist. (1) Normal procedure, where a work permit for a limited period is issued for a concrete place for which a home worker cannot be found. This system has to be made more transparent and flexible by introducing the joint procedure for issuing a work and residence permit (“one stop government”). (2) A regime which enables the immigration and permanent settlement of highly skilled experts. (3) These two immigration routes reflecting labour market needs are complemented by a limited number of “quota” immigrants chosen from applicants making use of the point scheme. In addition, foreign graduates of German Universities will be allowed to settle in Germany. For one year after completing their studies, they will be allowed to look for a job in Germany. A differentiated approach will be also introduced in relation to family reunification. While children up to 18 years can join “highly skilled” workers, with the other two categories family reunification will only be possible for children up to 12 years old. (This measure should improve the integration of children.) In the humanitarian filed, the contested institute of Duldung (“toleration status”) should be replaced by the leave to remain on humanitarian grounds, where appropriate. If humanitarian reasons do not exist, expulsion of the foreigners should be carried out rigorously. The law foresees more intense integration measures based on the idea of an “integration contract”. The State offers all newcomers the minimum integration offer (language courses, introduction into German culture, law and history). If the immigrant is lacking the requested knowledge, participation is compulsory. Non-participation may result in the loss of the residence permit while successful accomplishment may shorten the waiting period for a permanent residence permit (from 8 to 7 years). Sources: Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Steuerung und Begrenzung der Zuwanderung und zur Regelung des Aufenthalts und der Integration von Unionsbürger und Ausländern. Zuwanderungsgesetzes Entwurf einer Verordnung über Integrationskurze für Ausländer (Ausländerintegrationskursverordnung – AuslIntV) http://www.bmi.bund.de |
European Migration Waves |
The Development of the EU Asylum and
Migration Policies |
(1) reconstruction of Europe and post - war
labour migration (1945-1975) |
(1) the origins of inter-governmental cooperation (second half of 1970s -1993) |
(2) family reunification (mid 1970s - end of 1980s) |
(2) institutionalised inter-governmental cooperation (1993-1999) |
(3) forced migration, asylum seekers and refugees
(late 1980s - late 1990s) |
|
(4) the return of labour migration since the
turn of the century |
(3) the communitarisation of EU asylum and
migration policies since 1999 |
Box III.6 An Open Method of Coordination for Community Immigration Policy The open method of coordination, specifically adopted for the immigration field, shall complement the legislative framework set by the Amsterdam treaty. The method, which should be used for an initial period of 6 years, consists in the preparation and approval of European multiannual guidelines, which will set short, medium term and long term goals and targets. The European guidelines shall cover six areas: (1) developing a comprehensive and coordinated approach to migration management at the national level, (2) improving information available on legal possibilities for admission to the EU and on the consequences of using illegal channels, (3) reinforcing the fight against illegal immigration, smuggling and trafficking, (4) establishing a coherent and transparent policy and procedures for opening the labour market to third country nationals, (5) integrating migration issues into relations with third countries, in particular the countries of origin and (6) ensuring the development of integration policies. In order to implement each set of guidelines, Member States should prepare National Action Plans which will be reviewed and adapted on an annual basis. Source: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament On an Open Method of Coordination for Community immigration policy. COM (2001) 387 final. Brussels 11.7.2001. |
Box III.7 Draft Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe Art. III-166 concerns border controls. The EU shall develop policy with a view to ensure the absence of any controls of persons, whatever their nationality, when crossing internal borders, carrying out checks on persons and efficient monitoring of the crossing of external borders and gradual introduction of an integrated management system for external borders. Art. III-167 concerns the development of common policies on asylum, subsidiary protection and temporary protection. The goal is to develop “a common European asylum system” which should comprise various elements, such as “uniform status of asylum valid throughout the Union, a “uniform format of subsidiary protection”, a common system of temporary protection, and common procedures and standards for reception conditions. Art. III-168 deals with common immigration policy. The Union shall develop a common immigration policy aimed at ensuring, at all stages, the efficient management of migration flows, fair treatment of third country nationals and prevention of, and enhanced measures to combat, illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings. Newly, the support for integration action is explicitly referred to, but the harmonisation of integration legislation is excluded. The Member States shall preserve their right to determine volumes of admissions of third country labour migrants. Art. III-169 introduces principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility. Source: The European Convention. (18 July 2003) Draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe. (Title III, Chapter IV, Section 2) CONV 850/03, Brussels: author. |
Czech Republic |
|
Immigration Policies |
Integration Policies |
(1) liberal period (1990-mid 1990s) |
(1) initial period (1993 -1999) policies targeting specific groups (refugees, compatriots) |
(2) restrictions, adoption of the
EU acquis (mid 1990s-2000) |
|
(3) new
approaches to immigration since 2000 |
(2) constitutive period (2000 -
2003) |
(3) transformation period,
since 1 January 2004 |
Box IV.1 Czech Republic: Pilot Project of the Active Selection of Qualified Foreign Workers The outline of the Pilot Project of the Active Selection of Qualified Foreign Workers was approved in 2001, its full version in July 2002. The project is administered by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. The aim of the project is to test the possibility of operating a permanent immigration scheme to the Czech Republic. The model for the project is that of the Quebec point system. The applicant can achieve the maximum of 66 points. The minimum qualification criteria are set at 25 points. The evaluated criteria include employment relationship, work experience, achieved education, age (preferably 23-35), previous experience with life in the Czech Republic, language skills, and evaluation of the family. The project should enable a limited number of families to come and settle permanently in the Czech Republic. The settlement of those chosen is facilitated by the issuance of permanent residence permits after 3 years. (Normally, the foreigners have to wait 10 years.) The applicants have to secure a work permit themselves. The project was launched de facto with some delays in the summer of 2003. The quota for the first year was settled at 600 persons and at 1400 in the second. In reality, the project started in 2003 with the aim of involving 300 persons, 150 residing already on the territory and 150 from abroad (that is mainly from the three countries of origin selected.) On 3 November 2003, the first round of selection took place. In 2003, in two rounds of selection procedures, 126 persons applied and 114 were selected (92 Bulgaria, 17 Kazakhstan and 5 from Croatia.) With the exception of two persons from Kazakhstan, the applicants applied from Czech territory. The project is demanding, both administratively and financially. Three employees work full time at the embassies, while another six work in the centre. The launch of the project was accompanied by an intense media campaign. The reaction of the media was predominately positive, but critical. Some criticised the project because of its limited scope or because of the concrete selection of the three countries. Some considered it very bureaucratic. In February 2004, the Ministry of Labour submitted for discussion some proposals for changes in the project, including the extension of the project to cover another three countries. The proposal also involves a new element. In addition to the “country-based” selections, the project will also enable graduates from Czech universities to participate in the project, irrespective of their country of origin. Sources: Government of the Czech Republic (26 September 2001): Principy a postup realizace projektu “Aktivní výběr kvalifikovaných zahraničních pracovníků” The principles and the proposed implementation of the pilot project: “Active selection of qualified foreign workers.” Endorsed by Government Resolution No. 975/2001. Government of the Czech Republic (10 July 2002): Podrobný pilotný projekt “Aktivní výběr kvalifikovaných zahraničních pracovníků”. (The elaborated pilot project “Active selection of qualified foreign workers.) Endorsed by Government Resolution No. 720/2002. Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (February 2004): Zpráva o realizaci pilotního projektu Aktivní výběr kvalifikovaných zahraničních pracovníků v roce 2003 a návrh dalších změn. (Draft report on the implementation of the project of Active selection of qualified foreign workers.) http://www.imigrace.mpsv.cz Slovo 1/2003 |